2006-2007 ECAC and
Ivy League Standings
© 1999-2007,
Joe Schlobotnik
(archives)
URL for this frameset:
http://elynah.com/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?2007/ecac.standings.shtml
Game results taken from College Hockey News's
Division
I composite schedule
Standings including games of 2007 April 7
| # |
Team |
ECAC |
Ivy |
|---|
| W-L-T |
PF-PA-PR |
GB |
Pct |
W-L-T |
PF-PA-PR |
Pct |
|---|
| 1 |
St. Lawrence |
16-5-1 |
33-11-0 |
-- |
.750 |
| 2 |
Clarkson |
13-5-4 |
30-14-0 |
1½ |
.682 |
| 3 |
Dartmouth |
12-7-3 |
27-17-0 |
3 |
.614 |
6-3-1 |
13-7-0 |
.650 |
| 4 |
Cornell |
10-8-4 |
24-20-0 |
4½ |
.545 |
5-4-1 |
11-9-0 |
.550 |
| Quinnipiac |
10-8-4 |
24-20-0 |
4½ |
.545 |
| 6 |
Princeton |
10-10-2 |
22-22-0 |
5½ |
.500 |
3-5-2 |
8-12-0 |
.400 |
| Harvard |
10-10-2 |
22-22-0 |
5½ |
.500 |
3-6-1 |
7-13-0 |
.350 |
| 8 |
Colgate |
7-12-3 |
17-27-0 |
8 |
.386 |
| RPI |
6-11-5 |
17-27-0 |
8 |
.386 |
| Yale |
8-13-1 |
17-27-0 |
8 |
.386 |
6-3-1 |
13-7-0 |
.650 |
| 11 |
Brown |
6-12-4 |
16-28-0 |
8½ |
.364 |
3-5-2 |
8-12-0 |
.400 |
| 12 |
Union |
7-14-1 |
15-29-0 |
9 |
.341 |
Tiebreakers applied
Tied for 4th place: Cornell, Quinnipiac
Head-to-head record
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Cornell | 2-2 | .500 |
| Quinnipiac | 2-2 | .500 |
Record vs Top 3 (above tie)
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Cornell | 3-9 | .250 |
| Quinnipiac | 3-9 | .250 |
Top 8 is not complete; cannot apply!
Tied for 8th place: Colgate, Yale, RPI
Head-to-head record
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Colgate | 4-4 | .500 |
| Yale | 4-4 | .500 |
| RPI | 4-4 | .500 |
Top 4 is not complete; cannot apply!
Implementing infinite loop fix
Record vs Top 5 (above & including tie)
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Colgate | 5-15 | .250 |
| RPI | 5-15 | .250 |
| Yale | 3-17 | .150 |
Tied for 4th place: Cornell, Quinnipiac
Head-to-head record
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Cornell | 2-2 | .500 |
| Quinnipiac | 2-2 | .500 |
Record vs Top 3 (above tie)
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Cornell | 3-9 | .250 |
| Quinnipiac | 3-9 | .250 |
Top 8 is not complete; cannot apply!
Tied for 8th place: Colgate, RPI
Head-to-head record
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Colgate | 2-2 | .500 |
| RPI | 2-2 | .500 |
Top 4 is not complete; cannot apply!
Implementing infinite loop fix
Record vs Top 5 (above & including tie)
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Colgate | 5-15 | .250 |
| RPI | 5-15 | .250 |
Record vs Top 9 (above & including tie)
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Cornell | 16-16 | .500 |
| Quinnipiac | 14-18 | .438 |
Tied for 8th place: Colgate, RPI
Head-to-head record
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Colgate | 2-2 | .500 |
| RPI | 2-2 | .500 |
Record vs Top 4
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Colgate | 5-11 | .312 |
| RPI | 3-13 | .188 |
Tied for 6th place: Harvard, Princeton
Head-to-head record
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Harvard | 2-2 | .500 |
| Princeton | 2-2 | .500 |
Record vs Top 4
| Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
| Princeton | 9-7 | .562 |
| Harvard | 4-12 | .250 |
Key
- W
- Won
- L
- Lost
- T
- Tied
- PF
- Points For (2*W+T)
- PA
- Points Against (2*L+T)
- PR
- Points Remaining (2*[games left])
- GB
- Games behind ([{W-L}leader - {W-L}]/2)
- Pct
- Winning Percentage (PF/[PF+PA])
See Also
