2001-2002 ECAC and Ivy League Standings
© 1999-2002,
Joe Schlobotnik
(archives)
URL for this frameset:
http://elynah.com/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?2002/ecac.standings.shtml
Game results taken from US College Hockey
Online's Division
I composite schedule
Standings including games of 2002 March 17
# |
Team |
ECAC |
Ivy |
W-L-T |
PF-PA-PR |
GB |
Pct |
W-L-T |
PF-PA-PR |
Pct |
1 |
Cornell |
17-3-2 |
36-8-0 |
-- |
.818 |
6-3-1 |
13-7-0 |
.650 |
2 |
Clarkson |
11-6-5 |
27-17-0 |
4½ |
.614 |
3 |
Harvard |
10-9-3 |
23-21-0 |
6½ |
.523 |
4-5-1 |
9-11-0 |
.450 |
Dartmouth |
9-8-5 |
23-21-0 |
6½ |
.523 |
5-3-2 |
12-8-0 |
.600 |
RPI |
10-9-3 |
23-21-0 |
6½ |
.523 |
6 |
Princeton |
10-10-2 |
22-22-0 |
7 |
.500 |
4-5-1 |
9-11-0 |
.450 |
Colgate |
10-10-2 |
22-22-0 |
7 |
.500 |
Brown |
10-10-2 |
22-22-0 |
7 |
.500 |
3-7-0 |
6-14-0 |
.300 |
9 |
St. Lawrence |
9-11-2 |
20-24-0 |
8 |
.455 |
Yale |
9-11-2 |
20-24-0 |
8 |
.455 |
5-4-1 |
11-9-0 |
.550 |
11 |
Union |
8-11-3 |
19-25-0 |
8½ |
.432 |
12 |
Vermont |
3-18-1 |
7-37-0 |
14½ |
.159 |
Tiebreakers applied
Tied for 3rd place: Harvard, RPI, Dartmouth
Head-to-head record
Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
Harvard | 5-3 | .625 |
Dartmouth | 4-4 | .500 |
RPI | 3-5 | .375 |
Tied for 4th place: Dartmouth, RPI
Head-to-head record
Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
Dartmouth | 3-1 | .750 |
RPI | 1-3 | .250 |
Tied for 6th place: Brown, Princeton, Colgate
Head-to-head record
Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
Princeton | 5-3 | .625 |
Colgate | 5-3 | .625 |
Brown | 2-6 | .250 |
Tied for 6th place: Princeton, Colgate
Head-to-head record
Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
Princeton | 3-1 | .750 |
Colgate | 1-3 | .250 |
Tied for 9th place: Yale, St. Lawrence
Head-to-head record
Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
Yale | 2-2 | .500 |
St. Lawrence | 2-2 | .500 |
Record vs Top 5
Team |
PF-PA |
Pct. |
St. Lawrence | 10-10 | .500 |
Yale | 5-15 | .250 |
Key
- W
- Won
- L
- Lost
- T
- Tied
- PF
- Points For (2*W+T)
- PA
- Points Against (2*L+T)
- PR
- Points Remaining (2*[games left])
- GB
- Games behind ([{W-L}leader - {W-L}]/2)
- Pct
- Winning Percentage (PF/[PF+PA])
See Also